Papers / arXiv:2610.02516

Student-Guided Teacher Distillation for Efficient LLM Task Routing: Positioning Against Jev-Style System-1 Classifiers

Haifeng Wu, Srinivasan Manoharan, Jian Wan, Fangbo Tu, Junhua Zhao, Xin Chen·2026-10-01·cs.LG cs.AIrelevance 22.5

13 pages, 2 figures, 1 table

⚡ In one sentence AI-generated · check the original

A ModernBERT student retrieves a small top-k candidate set that a DeBERTa-v3 teacher reranks, reaching 77.5% teacher agreement and Coverage@16 of 91-100%, while truncated teacher scores fail as full soft targets for KL distillation.

Key findings

  • Best student checkpoint reaches 77.5% teacher agreement on a 200-example evaluation set.
  • Preliminary measurements show Coverage@16 of 91-100% for the top-k candidate sets.
  • Zeroing untruncated classes in truncated top-k teacher scores destroys dark knowledge, biasing KL distillation.

📄 Abstract

Zero-shot classifiers are useful for routing user requests to specialized LLM tasks, but scoring every request against a large candidate set is expensive: a zero-shot NLI classifier must evaluate one premise-hypothesis pair per label, so cost scales linearly with taxonomy size. We study a student-guided teacher distillation pipeline for a fixed taxonomy of 60 LLM task categories: a compact ModernBERT classifier predicts the full category distribution in one forward pass and retrieves a small top-k candidate set, and a larger DeBERTa-v3 zero-shot NLI classifier reranks only those candidates rather than all 60 labels; the resulting teacher labels iteratively improve the student, which produces sharper candidates for the next round. Unlike generic embedding retrieval or clustering-derived shortlists used in extreme multi-label classification, our candidate generator is trained end-to-end on the target taxonomy and is the same model serving production traffic, distinguishing it from LLM-routing work that routes between candidate models, and from concurrent System-1 encoder-classifier proposals (e.g. TypeSafe AI's Jev and the open-source Laya project) whose training methodology is undocumented or RL-based. Our best student checkpoint reaches 77.5% teacher agreement on a 200-example evaluation set, and preliminary coverage measurements show Coverage@16 of 91-100%, suggesting top-k sets retain most of the teacher's decision-relevant information. We further show truncated top-k teacher scores should not be treated as full 60-class soft targets for KL distillation: zeroing untruncated classes destroys the dark knowledge soft-label distillation depends on, introducing systematic bias rather than a harmless sparse approximation. A complete evaluation, including coverage at multiple k on a held-out set, an embedding-retrieval baseline, and a larger human-reviewed test set, remains in progress.

💬 Discussion 0

New post →
No discussion yet — start one.

Mirrored daily from decision.host · translations and summaries are AI-generated; the original is linked on every item.