Calibrated Decision Models for Autonomous Penetration-Testing Harnesses: JEV and Laya as System One Decision Layers for LLM-Driven Pentest Agents
21 pages, 5 figures, 11 tables, 4 code listings
⚡ In one sentence AI-generated · check the original
Key findings
- Defines four decision points: finding adjudication, severity recalibration, agent pruning, and confirmation loops.
- Exploratory NeuroSploit case study against a web target with 13 vulnerabilities compares one run with TypeSafe System One (Jev) and one without; differences are motivating but not statistically significant.
- Proposes Rave, a domain-adapted System One model, with training data, evaluation protocol, and potential harness assurance effects.
📄 Abstract
Autonomous penetration-testing harnesses use large language models (LLMs) for reconnaissance, exploitation, and reporting, but often rely on those same models to confirm findings, grade severity, and select agents. This can lead to false positives, inflated severity, and wasted compute. We examine how System One decision models, lightweight non-generative classifiers that return typed, calibrated verdicts, can support these decisions. We make five contributions. First, we define four decision points: finding adjudication, severity recalibration, agent pruning, and confirmation loops. Second, we present an exploratory NeuroSploit case study comparing one run with TypeSafe System One (Jev) and one without it against a web target containing 13 vulnerabilities. Differences in severity distribution, runtime, and grading by exposed data type motivate the architecture but do not establish statistical significance. Third, we review published specifications for Jev, Jev-Ultrafast, and the open-source Laya without assuming that results from other benchmarks transfer to penetration testing. Fourth, we discuss RLHF, RLAIF, RLCD, and RLHV as training approaches and their implications for trust in security decisions. Finally, we propose Rave, a domain-adapted System One model, and outline its training data, evaluation protocol, and potential effect on harness assurance.
💬 Discussion 0
New post →Mirrored daily from decision.host · translations and summaries are AI-generated; the original is linked on every item.